Efecto de la edad y el género sobre las consecuencias clínicas y económicas del tratamiento con especialidad farmacéutica de marca o genérica en pacientes con dolor neuropático periférico en práctica clínica habitual / Clinical and economic consequences of treating patients with peripheral neuropathic pain with brand name or generic drugs in routine clinical practice: The effects of age and sex

OBJETIVO: Analizar el efecto de la edad y el género sobre el dolor y los costes en pacientes con dolor neuropático periférico (DNp) crónico que inician tratamiento con gabapentina (marca) frente a gabapentina genérica (EFG). MÉTODOS: Estudio multicéntrico-retrospectivo, realizado con registros médicos electrónicos (RME) de pacientes de ambos géneros, > 18años, que iniciaron nuevo tratamiento con gabapentina de marca o genérico. Durante un año se midió la adherencia (ratio posesión medicación [RPM]) y la persistencia, la utilización de recursos sanitarios, los costes y la reducción del dolor. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 1.369 RME (61,1% mujeres; edad 64,6 [15,9] años, 52,4% ≥ 65 años); marca: 400, EFG: 969. La persistencia y la adherencia fueron mayores con marca: 7,3 vs. 6,3 meses (p < 0,001) y 86,5 vs. 81,3% de RPM (p < 0,001). Con marca, se observaron costes sanitarios menores, tanto en < 65 como en ≥ 65años (diferencias medias por paciente de 221 Euros [IC95%: 59-382] y de 217 Euros [51-382], respectivamente [p < 0,01]), como en hombres (diferencias medias de 197 Euros [63-328]) o mujeres (diferencias de 239 Euros [96-397]), p = 0,005 y p = 0,004, respectivamente. Comparado con EFG, el tratamiento con marca mostró una reducción mayor del dolor: 13,5% (10,9-16,2) y 10,8% (8,2-13,5) en < 65 y ≥ 65 años, respectivamente (p < 0,001), así como del 10,7% (8,2-13,2) y del 13,8% (11,0-16,5) en mujeres y hombres, respectivamente (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Con independencia del género o la edad, los pacientes que iniciaron tratamiento del DNp con gabapentina de marca vs. genérico mostraron un mayor grado de adherencia y persistencia al tratamiento, repercutiendo en unos menores costes sanitarios, a la vez que se observaron mayores reducciones del dolor

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyse the effects of age and sex on pain and cost for patients with chronic peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) who have started treatment with brand name gabapentin versus generic gabapentin (EFG). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre study using electronic medical records (EMR) for patients of both sexes, older than 18, who began treatment with brand name or generic gabapentin. Adherence (medication possession ratio [MPR]), persistence, use of healthcare resources, cost, and pain reduction were measured for one year. RESULTS: We analysed 1369 EMRs [61.1% women; mean age 64.6 (15.9), 52.4% ≥ 65 years]; 400 used brand name drugs while 969 used generic gabapentin. Persistence and adherence were higher in patients using brand name gabapentin (7.3 vs 6.3 months, P < .001; 86.5% vs 81.3% MPR, P < .001). Lower healthcare costs were observed in patients using brand-name gabapentin in both age groups (< 65 and ≥ 65). Mean difference in cost per patient amounted to Euros221 (95%CI: 59-382) and Euros 217 (95%CI: 51-382) in the < 65 and ≥ 65 age groups, respectively (P < .01). Mean difference in cost among men amounted to Euros 197 (63-328), while mean difference in cost among women amounted to Euros 239 (96-397) (P = .005 and P = .004, respectively). Compared with EFG, brand treatment showed greater pain relief: 13.5% (10.9-16.2) and 10.8% (8.2-13.5) in < 65 and ≥ 65year patients, respectively (P < .001), and 10.7% (8.2-13.2) and 13.8% (11.0-16.5) in women and men respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of sex and age, patients who started PNP treatment with brand name medication showed greater persistence and adherence to treatment than those taking generic drugs. Brand name treatment also involved lower healthcare costs, and greater pain relief

Clinical and economic consequences of treating patients with peripheral neuropathic pain with brand name or generic drugs in routine clinical practice: The effects of age and sex. / Efecto de la edad y el género sobre las consecuencias clínicas y económicas del tratamiento con especialidad farmacéutica de marca o genérica en pacientes con dolor neuropático periférico en práctica clínica habitual.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyse the effects of age and sex on pain and cost for patients with chronic peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) who have started treatment with brand name gabapentin versus generic gabapentin (EFG). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre study using electronic medical records (EMR) for patients of both sexes, older than 18, who began treatment with brand name or generic gabapentin. Adherence (medication possession ratio [MPR]), persistence, use of healthcare resources, cost, and pain reduction were measured for one year. RESULTS: We analysed 1369 EMRs [61.1% women; mean age 64.6 (15.9), 52.4%≥65 years]; 400 used brand name drugs while 969 used generic gabapentin. Persistence and adherence were higher in patients using brand name gabapentin (7.3 vs 6.3 months, P<.001; 86.5% vs 81.3% MPR, P<.001). Lower healthcare costs were observed in patients using brand-name gabapentin in both age groups (<65 and ≥65). Mean difference in cost per patient amounted to €221 (95%CI: 59-382) and €217 (95%CI: 51-382) in the <65 and ≥65 age groups, respectively (P<.01). Mean difference in cost among men amounted to €197 (63-328), while mean difference in cost among women amounted to €239 (96-397) (P=.005 and P=.004, respectively). Compared with EFG, brand treatment showed greater pain relief: 13.5% (10.9-16.2) and 10.8% (8.2-13.5) in <65 and ≥65year patients, respectively (P<.001), and 10.7% (8.2-13.2) and 13.8% (11.0-16.5) in women and men respectively (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of sex and age, patients who started PNP treatment with brand name medication showed greater persistence and adherence to treatment than those taking generic drugs. Brand name treatment also involved lower healthcare costs, and greater pain relief.

Prevalence of Insomnia and Associated Factors in Outpatients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder Treated in Psychiatric Clinics.

Sleep disturbance is one of the key diagnostic criteria for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). In this cross-sectional, prospective, observational, and multicenter study, factors associated with the prevalence of insomnia and the impact of insomnia-associated factors on quality of life were evaluated. Using multivariate analyses, the factor most strongly associated with the presence of insomnia (ISI ≥ 8) was the severity of the disorder (Odds Ratio [OR]: 9.253 for severe GAD; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.914-44.730; p = 0.006), pain interference and symptoms of depression (OR: 1.018; 95% CI 1.003-1.033; p = 0.016 and OR: 1.059; 95% CI 1.019-1.101; p = 0.004, respectively). Insomnia was not related to quality of life. Our results show insomnia to be a common health condition among patients with GAD, associated with the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms and pain interference.

Effect of propranolol on the factors promoting bacterial translocation in cirrhotic rats with ascites.

Bacterial translocation appears to be an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of spontaneous infections in cirrhosis. Cirrhotic patients are commonly treated with beta-adrenoceptor blockers, but the impact of this treatment in the factors promoting bacterial translocation has not been investigated. This study was aimed at investigating in cirrhotic rats with ascites the effect of propranolol on intestinal bacterial load, transit, and permeability of the bowel and on the rate of bacterial translocation. Bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes and intestinal bacterial overgrowth, permeability (urinary excretion of (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid [(99m)Tc-DTPA]), and transit (geometric center ratio of (51)Cr) were assessed in 29 rats with carbon tetrachloride (CCl(4)) cirrhosis and 20 controls. These variables were then measured in 12 placebo- and in 13 propranolol-treated ascitic cirrhotic rats. Bacterial translocation was present in 48% of the cirrhotic rats and in none of the controls. Cirrhotic rats with intestinal bacterial overgrowth had a significantly higher rate of translocation and slower intestinal transit than those without it. Among the 15 rats with overgrowth and a (99m)Tc-DTPA excretion greater than 10%, 15 had translocation and 2 had bacterial peritonitis. Only 1 of the 14 rats with either intestinal overgrowth or a (99m)Tc-DTPA excretion greater than 10% presented translocation. Compared with the placebo group, propranolol-treated animals had significantly lower portal pressure, faster intestinal transit, and lower rates of bacterial overgrowth and translocation. In ascitic cirrhotic rats, bacterial translocation results from intestinal overgrowth and severe damage to gut permeability. In this setting, intestinal overgrowth is associated with intestinal hypomotility. Propranolol accelerates the intestinal transit, decreasing the rates of bacterial overgrowth and translocation.

Factors mediating the hemodynamic effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in portal hypertensive rats.

Nitric oxide, prostacyclin, and glucagon have been implicated in promoting the hyperdynamic circulatory state of portal hypertension. Recent evidence also indicates that increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) production is involved in the pathogenesis of this hemodynamic abnormality. This study was aimed at investigating in rats with portal vein stenosis (PVS) the effects on splanchnic hemodynamics of blocking circulating TNF-alpha and the factors mediating the vascular action of this cytokine in this setting. Anti-TNF-alpha polyclonal antibodies or placebo was injected into rats (n = 96) before and 4 days after PVS (short-term inhibition) and at 24 h and 4, 7, 10 days after PVS (long-term inhibition). Short-term TNF-alpha inhibition reduced portal venous inflow and cardiac index and increased splanchnic and systemic resistance. Portal pressure was unchanged, but portal-systemic shunting was decreased. After long-term TNF-alpha inhibition, portal venous inflow and portal pressure were unchanged, but arterial pressure and systemic resistance rose significantly. Anti-TNF-alpha PVS rats exhibited lower increments of systemic resistance after Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester and indomethacin administration and lower serum levels of TNF-alpha, nitrates-nitrites, and 6-keto-PGF1alpha, both over the short and the long term. Serum glucagon levels rose after long-term inhibition. In conclusion, the specific role played by TNF-alpha in the development of the hyperdynamic state of portal hypertension appears to be mainly mediated through an increased release of nitric oxide and prostacyclin. Maintenance of the splanchnic hyperemia after long-term TNF-alpha inhibition could be due to a compensatory release of glucagon.

[Evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha factor in rats with portal hypertension using the radioactive microsphere technique]. / Evaluación de los efectos hemodinámicos del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa en ratas con hipertensión portal mediante le técnica de las microesferas radiactivas.

UNLABELLED: This study was aimed at investigating the effects of blocking circulating TNF on the hyperdynamic circulatory state developed in rats with portal vein stenosis (PVS), and the factors mediating the hemodynamic action of this cytokine in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Murine antiTNF polyclonal antibodies (100 microgram) or placebo were intravenously injected into PVS rats (n = 24) before and 4 days after PVS. Hemodynamic studies were performed the day after the last antiTNF injection. RESULTS: Short-term TNF inhibition led to reductions in cardiac index (p < 0.05) and portal venous inflow (p < 0.01), and significant increases in splanchnic and systemic vascular resistances. Portal pressure was unchanged, but portal-systemic shunting was decreased (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TNF plays a key role in promoting the development of the hyperdynamic state of portal hypertension. The effect of TNF is mediated through an increased release of nitric oxide.

Propranolol plus prazosin compared with propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the treatment of portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The association of prazosin to propranolol enhances the decrease in portal pressure but may cause hypotension and sodium retention. The aim of this study was to compare the portal pressure reduction and safety of the combination of propranolol plus prazosin with that of propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN). METHODS: Fifty-six portal-hypertensive cirrhotics received randomly propranolol plus prazosin (n = 28) or propranolol plus ISMN (n = 28) orally for 3 months. Hemodynamics and liver and renal function were assessed at baseline and after 3 months. RESULTS: Propranolol plus prazosin caused a greater reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than propranolol plus ISMN (-24.2% +/- 11% vs. -16.1% +/- 11%; P < 0.01). A reduction in HVPG of > 20% was significantly more frequent in the propranolol plus prazosin group than in the propranolol plus ISMN group (85% vs. 53%; P < 0.05). Neither treatment modified hepatic blood flow, quantitative liver function test results, glomerular filtration rate, plasma renin activity, or plasma aldosterone level. Side effects occurred in 13 patients receiving propranolol plus prazosin compared with 7 receiving propranolol plus ISMN (P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol plus prazosin has a greater portal pressure-lowering effect than propranolol plus ISMN. Both therapies were safe for liver and renal function. However, the combination of propranolol plus prazosin caused a greater decrease in arterial pressure and was less well tolerated than propranolol plus ISMN.

Selective impairment of endothelium-mediated vasodilation in liver transplant recipients with cyclosporin A-induced hypertension.

Arterial hypertension is commonly observed in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) recipients receiving cyclosporin A (CsA), but the precise pathogenetic mechanisms remain partially unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate endothelium-dependent and -independent dilation and adrenergic constriction of resistance vessels of OLT recipients treated with CsA. Vascular reactivity was examined in 22 OLT patients, 10 with and 12 without arterial hypertension, and in 10 control subjects by assessing the forearm blood flow response to the brachial artery infusion of increasing concentrations of methacholine chloride, sodium nitroprusside, and phenylephrine. In 10 OLT patients, the response to methacholine was also examined after acetylsalicylate. The ratio of serum nitrite and nitrate to serum creatinine was lower (P < .05) in OLT patients with hypertension than in nonhypertensive patients and controls. Basal forearm flow was similar in the three groups. Methacholine vasodilation was impaired in the hypertensive patients as shown by a lower maximum forearm vasodilator response and a shift in the dose response curve to methacholine to the right compared with the nonhypertensive OLT patients and the controls. The response to methacholine was not modified after salicylate. Forearm flow response to nitroprusside was similar in the three groups. No differences between the patients and the controls were found in the maximum forearm flow contraction in response to phenylephrine. An impairment in endothelium-dependent vasodilation could mediate arterial hypertension in OLT patients immunosuppressed with CsA.

Accuracy of portal and forearm blood flow measurements in the assessment of the portal pressure response to propranolol.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The portal pressure response to propranolol varies significantly in individual patients with cirrhosis. At present, propranolol responders can be identified only by measuring the hepatic venous pressure gradient. The aims of this study were: 1) to investigate whether the noninvasive monitoring of portal blood flow by pulsed Doppler ultrasound and forearm blood flow by strain-gauge plethysmography can predict the hepatic venous pressure gradient response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis, and 2) to analyze the factors that may influence this response. METHODS: Hemodynamic measurements were undertaken in 80 patients with cirrhosis before and after receiving propranolol (0.15 mg/kg i.v., n = 60) or placebo (n = 20). RESULTS: No changes were observed in the placebo group. Propranolol lowered (p < 0.01) hepatic venous pressure gradient from 17.6 +/- 3.8 to 14.7 +/- 3.8 mmHg, portal blood flow from 1122 +/- 363 to 897 +/- 332 ml/min and forearm blood flow from 7.52 +/- 3.1 to 6.12 +/- 2.3 ml/min%. Changes in hepatic venous pressure gradient were correlated (p < 0.01) with those of portal blood flow (r = 0.82) and forearm blood flow (r = 0.54). The reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient was > 20% in 23 patients ("responders"). The accuracy of portal Doppler flowmetry in identifying responders was higher than that of forearm plethysmography (88.3 vs. 68.3%, p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis proved that previous variceal bleeding was the only factor independently associated with a lack of response to propranolol (relative risk 3.42, 95% CI 1.5-7.4, p < 0.01). Hepatic venous pressure gradient reduction by propranolol was higher in non-bleeders than in bleeders (-19.9 +/- 9.4 vs. -11.3 +/- 8.6%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Portal Doppler ultrasound can be used as a reliable surrogate indicator of the hepatic venous pressure gradient response to acute propranolol administration. In addition, our study indicates that this response is mainly influenced by previous variceal hemorrhage.

Changes in gastrin and serum pepsinogens in monitoring of Helicobacter pylori response to therapy.

The aims of this study in 50 patients with H. pylori infection and duodenal ulcer were to examine the effect of eradication therapy on the serum levels of gastrin, pepsinogen I, and pepsinogen II and to investigate whether monitoring of the serum changes in these peptides after treatment could predict patient outcome. H. pylori status was assessed at entry and one and six months after therapy by culturing and microscopic analysis of the gastric mucosa and by [14C]urea breath test. Significant decreases were observed in the serum levels of gastrin (-11.4 +/- 3%), pepsinogen I (-28.9 +/- 4%), and pepsinogen II (-40.4 +/- 3%) in the 45 patients whose infection was eradicated, but not in the patients without eradication. Serum values of these peptides were unchanged in an additional group of 10 patients that only received omeprazol, none of whom had H. pylori eradicated. The best cutoff point of the percentage of each peptide to predict patient outcome was 10% for gastrin and pepsinogen I, and 15% for pepsinogen II. A pepsinogen II decrease > 15% resulted in the best marker of H. pylori clearance, accurately identifying patient outcome 86.6% of the time, whereas the diagnostic accuracy of gastrin and pepsinogen I was 61.7% and 76.6%, respectively. Significant correlations were found between the bacterial load assessed by histology with the serum concentrations of pepsinogen I and II and with the urease activity as measured by the amount of 14CO2 excreted. In conclusion, eradication of H. pylori infection is followed by a significant drop in serum levels of gastrin, pepsinogen I, and pepsinogen II. Changes in the latter are the most uniform and may be used as an indirect tool to predict treatment outcome.

Continuous prazosin administration in cirrhotic patients: effects on portal hemodynamics and on liver and renal function.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatic vascular resistance is influenced by alpha-adrenergic tone. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of continuous blockade of alpha-adrenoceptors with prazosin on hemodynamics, liver function, and renal function and whether the association of propranolol or furosemide enhances the portal pressure lowering effect of prazosin. METHODS: Cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension were studied at baseline and after a 3-month course of prazosin (n = 18) or placebo (n = 10). RESULTS: No changes were observed in the placebo group. Prazosin decreased the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) while increasing hepatic blood flow. Liver function improved as shown by an increase in hepatic and intrinsic hepatic clearances of indocyanine green and galactose elimination capacity. A significant reduction in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance was associated with increases in plasma renin activity and aldosterone concentration and a decrease in glomerular filtration rate. The plasma volume increased significantly, and 6 patients developed edema. The association of propranolol (n = 8) but not furosemide (n = 7) to prazosin increased the reduction in HVPG and attenuated the increase in plasma renin activity. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients, continuous prazosin administration reduces portal pressure and improves liver perfusion and function but favors sodium and water retention. The association of propranolol enhances the decrease in portal pressure, suggesting a potential benefit from this combined therapy.